Change font size: Switch to default font size Switch to medium font size Switch to large font size

  5th Annual Bank & Financial Institution Special Asset Executive Conference on Workouts (Florida)
Fort Lauderdale, FL
February 11-12, 2015
  The Crowdfunding Forum for Real Estate
New York, NY
March 09-10, 2015
  The 2nd Annual Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights
New York, NY
March 16-17, 2015
  The 2nd Annual Real Estate Private Equity Forum on Land & Homebuilding (East)
Miami, FL
April 14-15, 2015
  The 3rd Annual Single Family Rental Investment Forum (East)
Miami, FL
April 20-22, 2015
  The 3rd Annual Real Estate CFO Forum (West)
San Diego, CA
May 04-05, 2015
  The Real Estate Family Office and Private Wealth Management Forum
San Diego, CA
May 04-05, 2015
  The Real Estate & Bank General Counsel Forum (Midwest)
Chicago, IL
May 07, 2015
  5th Annual Financing, Investing & Real Estate Development for Data Centers (East)
New York, NY
May 28-29, 2015
  16th Annual US Real Estate Opportunity & Private Funds Investing Forum
New York, NY
June 15-16, 2015
Main Website >>Real Estate >>Blog >> Ambushed on the Oregon Trail
<< Back to Blog

Stephen Whelan, Partner, SNR DENTON US LLP

Ambushed on the Oregon Trail
Monday, February 28 2011 | 11:28 AM
Stephen Whelan

Senate Bill 892 was recently introduced in the Oregon legislature. It would affect any equipment sales or lease contract that contains a so-called “hell or high water”, or waiver of defenses clause and, by permitting the lessee or buyer to deposit payments into an attorney trust account or a statutory escrow trust account, would prohibit the lessor/seller or any assignee from enforcing the HHW clause or reporting the nonpayment “as a default or as information that may negatively affect the person’s credit rating…or ability to obtain credit.”

Commentators have identified at least one dozen defects or other problems with this Bill. One of them is that the Bill permits withholding of payments by reason of any “dispute” between the seller/lessor and the counterparty--not just a dispute over operation of the equipment or even a dispute relating to that particular contract. Another is that the Bill applies to any “payments”, so amount payable for maintenance, taxes, indemnities also could be placed in escrow, thereby forcing the lessor to pay property taxes or repair bills or else risk losing title to the equipment.

The Bill applies to assignees of the seller or lessor, so lenders, whole loan purchasers and securitizers would be prohibited from using the HHW clause to enforce payment. There is no provision for the lessor, securitizer or other assignee to receive interest, at the contract overdue rate, on the escrowed amounts.

In short, the proposal would undercut one of the linchpins of lease and securitized finance: the absolute and unconditional obligation of a lessee or purchaser to make payments. If enacted, it could force lenders, syndicators and securitizers to forbid any Oregon contract from being included in contract pools which they finance. Of course, the Bill is silent regarding which contracts would be affected, so the chilling effect on Oregon-related equipment would be even greater.
0 Comment | Add Comment(s) | Regulation, Securitization, Senate_Bill_892, Lease_Finance, Equipment,

<< Back to Blog

Leave a Comment

To make comments, please Sign-In