Change font size: Switch to default font size Switch to medium font size Switch to large font size

  The 3rd Annual Real Estate CFO Forum (West)
San Diego, CA
May 04-05, 2015
  The Real Estate Family Office and Private Wealth Management Forum
San Diego, CA
May 04-05, 2015
  The 2nd Annual Investment Forum on Spanish Real Estate
Madrid, Spain
May 06-07, 2015
  The Real Estate & Bank General Counsel Forum (Midwest)
Chicago, IL
May 07, 2015
  The Provider Forum on Financing & Investing in Data Centers & Cloud Services Infrastructure
New York, NY
May 28-29, 2015
  16th Annual US Real Estate Opportunity & Private Funds Investing Forum
New York, NY
June 15-16, 2015
  The 12th Annual New York Non-Traded REIT & Retail Alternative Investment Symposium
New York, NY
June 24-25, 2015
  The 2nd Annual Crowdfunding Forum for Real Estate
Santa Monica, CA
September 16-17, 2015
  The Real Estate Private Equity Forum on Senior Housing
Santa Monica, CA
September 17-18, 2015
  5th Annual Midwest Bank & Financial Institutions Special Assets Forum on Real Estate, C&I, and SBA Loans
Chicago, IL
September 17-18, 2015
Main Website >>Real Estate >>Blog >> Dodging a Bullet on the Oregon Trail
<< Back to Blog
Email/Share:

Stephen Whelan, Partner, SNR DENTON US LLP

Dodging a Bullet on the Oregon Trail
Thursday, March 10 2011 | 02:17 PM
Stephen Whelan
Partner, SNR DENTON US LLP

Readers of this blog were alerted last month to potentially ruinous legislation which had been introduced in the Oregon legislature. Senate Bill 892 would have overridden any contractual “hell or high water” clauses and permitted a lessee or buyer with any “dispute” with the seller or lessor--even if unrelated to the sale or lease contract--to deposit any “payments” (not just periodic installment purchase or rental payments) into an attorney trust account or a statutory escrow trust account, until the dispute had been “resolved”. There was no provision for the seller or lessor to receive interest on any amounts so escrowed.

The legislation also would have applied to lenders and securitization investors, so the Bill threatened to complicate any financing involving Oregon equipment or an Oregon lessee--and probably any Oregon seller, lessor or lender. But this week, face to face discussions by the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association (and member law firm Farleigh Wada Witt) with the sponsor of the Bill were followed by withdrawal of the legislation. Further discussions are expected because of the sponsor’s unsatisfactory experience with processing equipment acquired for use in his business, but it appears that the Senator is aware that legislation as originally introduced could have impeded the flow of capital to Oregon businesses.
0 Comment | Add Comment(s) | Bill_892, Legislation, Regulation, ELFA, Equipment_Leasing,


<< Back to Blog
Email/Share:

Leave a Comment

To make comments, please Sign-In