Change font size: Switch to default font size Switch to medium font size Switch to large font size

  15th Annual European Real Estate Opportunity & Private Fund Investing Forum
London, UK
November 3-4, 2014
  Borrower & Investor Forum on Real Estate Mezzanine Financing & Subordinated Debt
New York, NY
November 10, 2014
  5th Annual Financing, Investing & Real Estate Development for Data Centers (West)
Half Moon Bay, CA
November 12-13, 2014
  The 3rd Annual Single Family Rental Investment Forum
Scottsdale, AZ
December 3-5, 2014
  10th Annual Non-Traded REIT & Retail Alternative Investment Symposium
Dana Point, CA
December 3-4, 2014
  12th Annual Winter Forum On Real Estate Opportunity & Private Fund Investing
Laguna Beach, CA
January 21-23, 2015
  5th Annual Bank & Financial Institution Special Asset Executive Conference on Workouts (Florida)
Fort Lauderdale, FL
February 11-12, 2015
  The 2nd Annual Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights
New York, NY
March 16-17, 2015
  The 2nd Annual Real Estate Private Equity Forum on Land & Homebuilding (East)
Miami, FL
April 14-15, 2015
  The 3rd Annual Real Estate CFO Forum (West)
Orange County, CA
May 4-5, 2015
Main Website >>Real Estate >>Blog >> Tag: Mortgage
<< Back to Blog

Ron D'Vari, Chief Executive Officer & Co-Founder, NEWOAK

New Regs Suggest Need for Independent Collateral Valuation
Thursday, March 10 2011 | 11:09 AM
Ron D'Vari
Chief Executive Officer & Co-Founder, NEWOAK

While much attention and scrutiny has been given to the effects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on the financial services industry, other recent regulatory changes will also have profound effects on the way financial institutions do business. One key trend: the need for independent collateral valuation, particularly regarding complex or hard to value collateral, such as many asset-backed securities, whole loans, real estate, pools of receivables and leases.

The motivation behind the new regulations is a perceived need for independent, conflict-free, professional judgment, without influence or pressure that could possibly be exerted by parties having an interest in the transaction. Driving this perception has been the massive federal loss exposure in the aftermath of the subprime financial crisis.

The portfolio valuation requirements of the 2010 Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines[1] (which replace the 1994 guidelines) flesh out the new federal expectations; these changes will have application to a wide variety of institutions, including: federally chartered banks and those accepting FDIC insured deposits; fund managers and others who make representations about collateral to public investors; investment bankers; and rating agencies.

Given the regulatory trend, it appears certain to us that the Agencies will follow the lead of the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom, which has required financial services firms to engage outside experts to provide independent, conflict-free valuation and risk analysis. This requirement provides an institution with a defendable (i.e., independent) valuation of the portfolio components.

Pursuant to the Guidelines, each financial institution must maintain policies and procedures which establish standards for obtaining current collateral valuation information. The institution may employ a variety of techniques for monitoring the effect of collateral valuation trends on portfolio risk associated with its lending practices.

Changes in market conditions underscore the importance of following sound collateral valuation practices and monitoring when originating or modifying real estate loans and evaluating portfolio risk.
The Agencies implicitly are addressing three major risk exposures that drive the government’s interest in objective third-party collateral validation practices:

1. The FDIC scheme of depository insurance, which depends crucially upon the soundness of bank lending practices.

2. Agency guarantees on mortgage-backed securities provided by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

3. The potential government responsibility to bail out financial institutions deemed “too big to fail.”

The drafting of the Guidelines is a joint effort of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Office of Thrift Supervision, Treasury; and National Credit Union Administration (collectively, the “Agencies”). The Agencies have committed to work together to ensure that real estate lending is conducted in a safe and sound manner.

Note: Contributors to this blog post include members of the NewOak Capital team.
0 Comment | Add Comment(s) | Dodd_Frank, FDIC, US_Economy, Regulation, Securities, OCC, Mortgage,

<< Back to Blog