Change font size: Switch to default font size Switch to medium font size Switch to large font size

  The 2nd Annual Sunshine Backed Bonds™: Where Solar Meets Wall Street
New York, NY
May 2, 2014
  Global ABS 2014
Barcelona, Spain
10-12 June 2014
  The 20th Annual ABS East Conference
Miami Beach, Florida
September 21-23, 2014
  6th Annual Covered Bonds The Americas Conference
New York, NY
October 6, 2014
  12th Annual African Capital Markets Conference
Cape Town, South Africa
November 13-14, 2014
Main Website >>Structured Finance >>Blog >> Tag: Equipment
<< Back to Blog
Email/Share:

Stephen Whelan, Partner, SNR DENTON US LLP

Ambushed on the Oregon Trail
Monday, February 28 2011 | 11:28 AM
Stephen Whelan
Partner, SNR DENTON US LLP

Senate Bill 892 was recently introduced in the Oregon legislature. It would affect any equipment sales or lease contract that contains a so-called “hell or high water”, or waiver of defenses clause and, by permitting the lessee or buyer to deposit payments into an attorney trust account or a statutory escrow trust account, would prohibit the lessor/seller or any assignee from enforcing the HHW clause or reporting the nonpayment “as a default or as information that may negatively affect the person’s credit rating…or ability to obtain credit.”

Commentators have identified at least one dozen defects or other problems with this Bill. One of them is that the Bill permits withholding of payments by reason of any “dispute” between the seller/lessor and the counterparty--not just a dispute over operation of the equipment or even a dispute relating to that particular contract. Another is that the Bill applies to any “payments”, so amount payable for maintenance, taxes, indemnities also could be placed in escrow, thereby forcing the lessor to pay property taxes or repair bills or else risk losing title to the equipment.

The Bill applies to assignees of the seller or lessor, so lenders, whole loan purchasers and securitizers would be prohibited from using the HHW clause to enforce payment. There is no provision for the lessor, securitizer or other assignee to receive interest, at the contract overdue rate, on the escrowed amounts.

In short, the proposal would undercut one of the linchpins of lease and securitized finance: the absolute and unconditional obligation of a lessee or purchaser to make payments. If enacted, it could force lenders, syndicators and securitizers to forbid any Oregon contract from being included in contract pools which they finance. Of course, the Bill is silent regarding which contracts would be affected, so the chilling effect on Oregon-related equipment would be even greater.
0 Comment | Add Comment(s) | Regulation, Securitization, Senate_Bill_892, Lease_Finance, Equipment,


<< Back to Blog
Email/Share: